• español
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • English
    • italiano
    • português
  • Navegar
  • English 
    • español
    • Deutsch
    • français
    • English
    • italiano
    • português
  • Login



Biblioteca General Alfonso Borrero Cabal S.J.

View Item 
  •   Institutional Repository - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Revistas Científicas Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Gerencia y Políticas de Salud
  • View Item
  •   Institutional Repository - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Revistas Científicas Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
  • Gerencia y Políticas de Salud
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Guías de uso Condiciones de usoDirectricesGuía de autoarchivoCarta de autorizaciónPreguntas frecuentes

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsDirectorsTitlesSubjectsSpatial coverageTemporary coverageCitiesMunicipalitiesDepartmentsCommunityDocument typeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsDirectorsTitlesSubjectsSpatial coverageTemporary coverageCitiesMunicipalitiesDepartmentsCommunityDocument type

My Account

LoginRegister
Estadísticas GTMVer Estadísticas GTMVer Estadísticas del Ítem

Were are we now in british health economics ? Mark Blaug

Thumbnail
Date
2005-06-01

Authors

Blaug, Mark; University of Exeter, UK

Publisher

Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

ISSN

1657-7027

COAR

Artículo de revista
Share this record

Citación

       
TY - GEN T1 - Were are we now in british health economics ? Mark Blaug AU - Blaug, Mark; University of Exeter, UK Y1 - 2005-06-01 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10554/25268 PB - Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana AB - Health economics took off in 1970 or thereabouts, just after the take-off date for the economics of education. Although early health economics made use of human capital theory as did the economics of education, it soon took a different route inspired by Arrow’s work on medical insurance. The economics of education failed to live up to its promising start in the 1960s and gradually ran out of steam. The economies of health, however, has made steady theoretical and empirical progress since 1970 principally in coming to grips with the implications of supplierinduced demand and the difficulties of evaluating health care outcomes. Some of the best work on British health economics has been in the area of normative welfare economies, defining more precisely what is meant by equity in the delivery of health care and measuring the degree of success in achieving equity. Recent efforts to reform the NHS by the introduction of “quasi markets” have improved the quality and quantity of health care in Britain. In short, British health economics has been characterized by the use of Pigovian piecemeal rather than Paretian global welfare economics, retaining a distinctive style that sets it apart from American health economies. ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ER - @misc{10554_25268, author = {}, title = {Were are we now in british health economics ? Mark Blaug}, year = {2005-06-01}, abstract = {Health economics took off in 1970 or thereabouts, just after the take-off date for the economics of education. Although early health economics made use of human capital theory as did the economics of education, it soon took a different route inspired by Arrow’s work on medical insurance. The economics of education failed to live up to its promising start in the 1960s and gradually ran out of steam. The economies of health, however, has made steady theoretical and empirical progress since 1970 principally in coming to grips with the implications of supplierinduced demand and the difficulties of evaluating health care outcomes. Some of the best work on British health economics has been in the area of normative welfare economies, defining more precisely what is meant by equity in the delivery of health care and measuring the degree of success in achieving equity. Recent efforts to reform the NHS by the introduction of “quasi markets” have improved the quality and quantity of health care in Britain. In short, British health economics has been characterized by the use of Pigovian piecemeal rather than Paretian global welfare economics, retaining a distinctive style that sets it apart from American health economies. ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.}, url = {http://hdl.handle.net/10554/25268} }RT Generic T1 Were are we now in british health economics ? Mark Blaug A1 Blaug, Mark; University of Exeter, UK YR 2005-06-01 LK http://hdl.handle.net/10554/25268 PB Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana AB Health economics took off in 1970 or thereabouts, just after the take-off date for the economics of education. Although early health economics made use of human capital theory as did the economics of education, it soon took a different route inspired by Arrow’s work on medical insurance. The economics of education failed to live up to its promising start in the 1960s and gradually ran out of steam. The economies of health, however, has made steady theoretical and empirical progress since 1970 principally in coming to grips with the implications of supplierinduced demand and the difficulties of evaluating health care outcomes. Some of the best work on British health economics has been in the area of normative welfare economies, defining more precisely what is meant by equity in the delivery of health care and measuring the degree of success in achieving equity. Recent efforts to reform the NHS by the introduction of “quasi markets” have improved the quality and quantity of health care in Britain. In short, British health economics has been characterized by the use of Pigovian piecemeal rather than Paretian global welfare economics, retaining a distinctive style that sets it apart from American health economies. ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. OL Spanish (121) TY - GEN T1 - Were are we now in british health economics ? Mark Blaug AU - Blaug, Mark; University of Exeter, UK Y1 - 2005-06-01 UR - http://hdl.handle.net/10554/25268 PB - Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana AB - Health economics took off in 1970 or thereabouts, just after the take-off date for the economics of education. Although early health economics made use of human capital theory as did the economics of education, it soon took a different route inspired by Arrow’s work on medical insurance. The economics of education failed to live up to its promising start in the 1960s and gradually ran out of steam. The economies of health, however, has made steady theoretical and empirical progress since 1970 principally in coming to grips with the implications of supplierinduced demand and the difficulties of evaluating health care outcomes. Some of the best work on British health economics has been in the area of normative welfare economies, defining more precisely what is meant by equity in the delivery of health care and measuring the degree of success in achieving equity. Recent efforts to reform the NHS by the introduction of “quasi markets” have improved the quality and quantity of health care in Britain. In short, British health economics has been characterized by the use of Pigovian piecemeal rather than Paretian global welfare economics, retaining a distinctive style that sets it apart from American health economies. ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. ER -
Gestores bibliográficos
Refworks
Zotero
BibTeX
CiteULike
Mendeley
Metadata
Show full item record

Resumen

Health economics took off in 1970 or thereabouts, just after the take-off date for the economics of education. Although early health economics made use of human capital theory as did the economics of education, it soon took a different route inspired by Arrow’s work on medical insurance. The economics of education failed to live up to its promising start in the 1960s and gradually ran out of steam. The economies of health, however, has made steady theoretical and empirical progress since 1970 principally in coming to grips with the implications of supplierinduced demand and the difficulties of evaluating health care outcomes. Some of the best work on British health economics has been in the area of normative welfare economies, defining more precisely what is meant by equity in the delivery of health care and measuring the degree of success in achieving equity. Recent efforts to reform the NHS by the introduction of “quasi markets” have improved the quality and quantity of health care in Britain. In short, British health economics has been characterized by the use of Pigovian piecemeal rather than Paretian global welfare economics, retaining a distinctive style that sets it apart from American health economies. ©1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Link to the resource

http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/gerepolsal/article/view/2758

URI

http://hdl.handle.net/10554/25268
Google Analytics Statistics
Collections
  • Gerencia y Políticas de Salud [369]

Indexado por:


Pontificia Universidad Javeriana - Bogotá D.C.- Colombia - Carrera 7 No. 40 - 62 - Tel: (57 1) 3208320 ext 2148- repositorio@javeriana.edu.co

Contacto | Mapa del sitio | Trabaje en la Javeriana | Tratamiento de datos personales | Condiciones de uso y términos legales

 

Sujeta a inspección y vigilancia por parte del Ministerio de Educación Nacional (artículo 39 del decreto 1295 de 2010)

Certificado de Existencia y Representación Legal