Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenceAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.contributor.authorPontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística
dc.contributor.authorDe Vries, Esther
dc.contributor.authorPardo, Constanza
dc.contributor.authorWiesner, Carolina
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-25T20:56:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T13:24:51Z
dc.date.available2020-03-25T20:56:45Z
dc.date.available2020-04-15T13:24:51Z
dc.date.created2017-08-28
dc.identifierhttp://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/10.1200/JGO.17.00093spa
dc.identifier.issn23789506 (Electrónico)spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/47856
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.languagespaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Global Oncology; Vol. 4 (2017)spa
dc.titleActive versus passive cancer registry methods make the difference : case report from Colombiaspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.description.quartilescopusQ2spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00093spa
dc.description.tipoarticuloCarta al editorspa
dc.description.paginas1-3spa
dc.format.soportePapel / Electrónicospa
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International