Mostrar el registro sencillo del registro

dc.rights.licenceAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.contributor.authorGil-Rojas, Yaneth
dc.contributor.authorGarzón, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorLasalvia Rodriguez, Pieralessandro
dc.contributor.authorHernández, Fabián
dc.contributor.authorCastañeda-Cardona, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorRosselli, Diego
dc.coverage.spatialColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-27T20:25:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T13:26:54Z
dc.date.available2020-03-27T20:25:50Z
dc.date.available2020-04-15T13:26:54Z
dc.date.created2019-05-19
dc.identifierhttps://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.javeriana.edu.co/science/article/pii/S2212109919300500#!spa
dc.identifier.issn2212-1099 / 2212- 1102 (Electrónico)spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/47900
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.languagespaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceValue in Health Regional Issues; Vol. 20 (2019)spa
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery compared with nonsurgical treatment in people with obesity and comorbidity in Colombiaspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.description.quartilescopusQ2spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2019.01.010spa
dc.description.tipoarticuloArtículo originalspa
dc.description.paginas79-85spa
dc.format.soportePapel / Electrónicospa
dc.subject.keywordCost-effectivenessspa
dc.subject.keywordCost-utilityspa
dc.subject.keywordBariatric surgeryspa
dc.subject.keywordObesityspa
dc.subject.keywordPharmacologic treatmentspa
dc.description.abstractenglishBackground The increase in obesity prevalence and its relationship with multiple cardiovascular complications have raised the burden of obesity in the general population. Bariatric surgery has shown to be more effective in reducing weight than the traditional pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments. Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this alternative compared with standard treatment in the Colombian context. Methods A Markov single cohort model was used to simulate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained every year over a base-case 5-year time horizon. The model considers 5 health states: comorbidity, remission, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Four comorbidity conditions were evaluated separately: diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and sleep apnea. The model was evaluated from a third-payer perspective. All costs were expressed in 2016 Colombian pesos ($1.00 = 3051 COP). A 5% annual discount rate was applied to both costs and outcomes. Results In baseline analysis, bariatric surgery was a cost-effective alternative compared with nonsurgical treatment in the diabetes and hypertension cohort with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $6  194 899 and $43 689 527 per QALY gained, respectively. In the sleep apnea cohort, surgery has greater effectiveness and lower costs, which is why it is a dominant strategy. In the dyslipidemia cohort, bariatric surgery is dominated by the nonsurgical approach. Conclusion The current study provides evidence that bariatric surgery is a cost-effective alternative among some cohorts in the Colombian setting. For obese patients with sleep apnea or diabetes, bariatric surgery is a recommendable alternative (dominant and cost-effective, respectively) for the Colombian healthcare system.spa
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.contributor.corporatenamePontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística


Ficheros en el registro

Thumbnail

Este registro aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del registro

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del registro se describe como Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional