Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenceAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.contributor.authorPinzon Florez, Carlos Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorRoselli, Diego
dc.contributor.authorGamboa Garay, Oscar Andrés
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-27T17:28:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T15:26:49Z
dc.date.available2020-04-27T17:28:35Z
dc.date.available2020-05-08T15:26:49Z
dc.date.created2012-10-22
dc.identifierhttps://www.valuehealthregionalissues.com/article/S2212-1099(12)00059-3/fulltextspa
dc.identifier.issn2212-1099 / 2212-1102 (Electrónico)spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/48431
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.languagespaspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.sourceValue in Health Regional Issues; Núm. 1 (2012)spa
dc.subjectTamizaciónspa
dc.subjectCáncer colorrectalspa
dc.subjectCosto efectividadspa
dc.titleAnálisis de costo-efectividad de las estrategias de tamización de cáncer colorrectal en Colombiaspa
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.hasversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.description.quartilescopusQ4spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2012.09.006spa
dc.description.paginas190-200spa
dc.format.soportePapel / Electrónicospa
dc.description.abstractenglishObjective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer in Colombia. Methods We designed a Markov model to compare the clinical and economic impact in terms of reducing the incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). Six screening strategies for adults were compared: fecal occult blood (FOBT) immunochemical and guaiac type, conventional colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and FOBT guaiac and immunochemical type more sigmoidoscopy. We used the third-party payer perspective, including only direct costs, the time horizon was the life expectancy of the Colombian population. We estimated cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER). Were performed deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic. We applied a discount rate of 3% in the costs and health outcomes. Results The screening strategy more cost-effective was the FOBT biennial guaiac type. The cost per life year gained was US$10,347.37, US$18,380.64, and US$45,158.05. For FOBT guaiac biennial, FOBT guaiac annual and FOBT inmunoquímica biennial respectively. The ICER is sensitive to the percentage of false positive test for FOBT guaiac type values greater than 10%, and the cost of the test. Conclusions The screening strategy more cost-effective for Colombia is the FOBT biennial guaiac type, using as a threshold the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Colombia.spa
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.contributor.corporatenamePontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional