Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenceAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Jose Nicolas
dc.contributor.authorFarhat, Walid A.
dc.sourceFrontiers in Surgery; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2019)spa
dc.titleA comprehensive analysis of robot-assisted surgery uptake in the pediatric surgical disciplinespa
dc.description.tipoarticuloArtículo de revisión sistemáticaspa
dc.subject.keywordRobot-assisted surgeryspa
dc.subject.keywordMinimally invasive surgeryspa
dc.subject.keywordBibliometric analysisspa
dc.description.abstractenglishIntroduction: Robotic assisted surgery (RAS) is one of the most recent surgical approaches that has quickly been adopted by the pediatric urology community. Over the last decade, a vast amount of manuscripts has been published, supporting the safety and applicability of RAS in the pediatric population. The quality of published literature about this innovative technology remains supported by case-reports and retrospective case-series. Historical behavior of literature productivity and implementation of laparoscopy followed a similar trend. We present the historical publication uptake of RAS in pediatric urology and other surgical disciplines using a bibliometric comparison of the most cited manuscripts. Materials and Methods: A systematic search and review of the literature was undertaken by the authors. Literature search was performed in OVID, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search period included all publications between 1985 and June 2018. All languages were included. Data analysis for graphical representation was performed using VOSviewer® version 1.6.8 and Impact Index Analysis was used to adjust the citations by the time since publication. Results: A total of 1,014 titles were identified. After applying exclusion criteria, 200 papers were included for the RAS arm and 402 for the laparoscopic one. Case-series was the most common type of publication. Average citations for laparoscopic manuscripts was 23 (SD ± 31) and for RAS was 20 (SD ± 31.5). The impact index analysis showed an average of 95 (SD ± 167) for laparoscopic manuscripts vs. 66 (SD ± 101) for RAS. The laparoscopic manuscript with the highest citation count had 199 citations with an impact index of 12.1. And the RAS manuscript with the highest citation count had 280 citations and an impact index of 4.3. Conclusion: Literature productivity in pediatric laparoscopic and RAS has quickly grown. Pediatric Urologists play a key role in the introduction of this innovative tool. Literature supporting its implementation and future consolidation requires to focus on increasing the level of
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.contributor.corporatenamePontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Cirugía y Especialidades. Grupo de Investigación de Cirugía y Especialidades

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional