Show simple item record

dc.rights.licenceAtribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional*
dc.contributor.authorPérez Pérez, Sara Margarita
dc.contributor.authorCárdenas Arias, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorJaramillo Ramírez, Daniela
dc.contributor.authorEduardo Martínez, Camilo
dc.contributor.authorTamayo Martínez, Nathalie
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T16:57:55Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T16:57:55Z
dc.date.created2024-01
dc.identifierhttps://journalretinavitreous.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40942-023-00504-6spa
dc.identifier.issn2056-9920spa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10554/66702
dc.description.abstractBackground Perfluorocarbon (PFC)possesses unique chemical properties that favor the pigment epithelium’s adhesion and allows the drainage of subretinal fluid through retinal holes present in retinal detachment cases. However, PFC as a temporary tamponade agent has been limited due to its high potential for toxicity. Main body We conducted a scoping review regarding the use of PFC in vitreoretinal surgery as a temporary tamponade in subjects with severe ocular trauma or severe retinal detachment who received a therapeutic intervention (vitrectomy via posterior approach with the use of PFC as a temporary tamponade), compared to vitrectomy without the use of PFC as a temporary tamponade. Outcomes of interest were retinal reattachment, visual acuity (VA), postoperative complications and retinal toxicity. The search was performed in Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Medline Daily Update, Embase databases. Reference lists from relevant review articles were also included. Two hundred thirty-eight studies were found, with no duplicate entries. In the first selection, 230 articles were eliminated; in the second selection, 6 additional articles were discarded. In total, 8 articles were obtained in this review. Two selected articles corresponded to animal studies and 6 to studies in humans. Regarding study design, 5 were case series, and 1 was a cohort study. Conclusion PFC as a short-term tamponade had high rates of reapplication, improved VA, and the most frequent adverse effects were reversible after PFC withdrawal. Nonetheless, the quality of the studies was poor. Studies with more rigorous methodologies are needed to determine visual and structural outcomes and potential risks of PFC use as a temporary tamponade in vitreoretinal surgery.spa
dc.formatPDFspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.subjectPerfluorocarbonospa
dc.subjectTraumatismos oculares gravesspa
dc.titleEfficacy of the use of perfluorocarbon as a temporary tamponade agent in severe ocular trauma and/or complex retinopexy: a scoping reviewspa
dc.type.hasversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.description.quartilescopusQ2spa
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-023-00504-6spa
dc.subject.keywordPerfluorocarbonspa
dc.subject.keywordSevere ocular traumaspa
dc.description.abstractenglishBackground Perfluorocarbon (PFC)possesses unique chemical properties that favor the pigment epithelium’s adhesion and allows the drainage of subretinal fluid through retinal holes present in retinal detachment cases. However, PFC as a temporary tamponade agent has been limited due to its high potential for toxicity. Main body We conducted a scoping review regarding the use of PFC in vitreoretinal surgery as a temporary tamponade in subjects with severe ocular trauma or severe retinal detachment who received a therapeutic intervention (vitrectomy via posterior approach with the use of PFC as a temporary tamponade), compared to vitrectomy without the use of PFC as a temporary tamponade. Outcomes of interest were retinal reattachment, visual acuity (VA), postoperative complications and retinal toxicity. The search was performed in Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Medline Daily Update, Embase databases. Reference lists from relevant review articles were also included. Two hundred thirty-eight studies were found, with no duplicate entries. In the first selection, 230 articles were eliminated; in the second selection, 6 additional articles were discarded. In total, 8 articles were obtained in this review. Two selected articles corresponded to animal studies and 6 to studies in humans. Regarding study design, 5 were case series, and 1 was a cohort study. Conclusion PFC as a short-term tamponade had high rates of reapplication, improved VA, and the most frequent adverse effects were reversible after PFC withdrawal. Nonetheless, the quality of the studies was poor. Studies with more rigorous methodologies are needed to determine visual and structural outcomes and potential risks of PFC use as a temporary tamponade in vitreoretinal surgeryspa
dc.type.localArtículo de revistaspa
dc.contributor.corporatenamePontificia Universidad Javeriana. Facultad de Medicina. Departamento de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadísticaspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Pontificia Universidad Javerianaspa
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional - Pontificia Universidad Javerianaspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.javeriana.edu.cospa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_beb9spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalInternational Journal of Retina and Vitreousspa
dc.description.indexingRevista Internacional - Indexadaspa
dc.relation.citationvolume10spa
dc.relation.citationissue6spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa
dc.description.esciSispa


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional