Memoriales de participación en concurso Moot Court Nacional de Derecho de Seguros Hernán Fabio López
Date
2024-10-10Share this record
Metadata
Show full item record
PDF documents
English Title
Motions of participation in the National Insurance Law Moot Court Competition Hernán Fabio LópezResumen
Escritos de participación desarrollados por los autores para participar en el concurso nacional "Moot Court Nacional de Derecho de Seguros Hernán Fabio López" en donde se desarrolla un proceso judicial de un caso ficticio basado en el derecho de daños, derecho de seguros y responsabilidad comercial.
El primer memorial presentado refiere a una demanda por vía ejecutiva en contra de una aseguradora donde solicitamos en representación del "Ministerio de Vías y Desarrollo Sostenible" la afectación de una póliza todo riesgo en virtud de la cobertura sobre un contrato de concesión para la construcción de una vía en la costa atlántica colombiana.
El equipo buscó argumentar la interrupción de la prescripción respecto a la acción derivada del contrato de seguro y utilizar los amparos que emanan de la misma para solicitar la pretensión indemnizatoria.
El segundo memorial se basa en presentar la contestación a una demanda aleatoria asignada por el concurso sobre el mismo caso, pero desde la perspectiva de la aseguradora. El equipo enfocó la argumentación en las distintas exclusiones aplicables de la póliza al caso y al actuar del asegurado,
Utilizó disposiciones legales para desacreditar la cuantía reclamada, la propagación y agravación del estado del riesgo, uso de los principios que gobiernan el contrato de seguro, entre otros.
Abstract
The written pieces that where requiered by teams, in order to participate in the “Moot Court Seguros Hernán Fabio López” consisted of developing and studying a fictional case that revolved around tort law, ensurance law and comercial liability.
The first motion that the group had to present, in the form of a written assigment, consisted of a lawsuit filed in representation of the Ministry of Roads and sustainable development, as an executive motion against the ensurance company, seeking to receive full compensation of the coverage provided by an “all risk” ensurance contract, that applied over the construction of a roadway in the Colombian Atlantic coast.
The team intended to argue, that the Ministry of Roads had a real claim to the compensation, because of the fact that the statute of limitations wouldn't apply. Also, the team argued that the facts around the controversy where within the coverage of the insurance policy issued by the sued Insurance Company
The second motion presented by the group, consisted of presenting a counter-sue to a random lawsuit (constructed by another group of the contest). In this instance, the team decided to focus on argumenting the different exclusions included in the insurance contract, which made the plaintiffs claim unsustained.
Some of them where: The size of the claims made by the plaintiff is unjustified, the plaintiff did not act according to the best of his abilities to stop the damages from happening and used the basic principles that govern the insurance contract which could discredit a claim, amongst others.
Collections
- Derecho [1386]
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional